Intake Modification
#2
RE: Intake Modification
I have been thinking about it, too...
http://www.texastruckscene.com/phpBB...pic.php?t=1647
No probs so far...
http://www.texastruckscene.com/phpBB...pic.php?t=1647
No probs so far...
#3
RE: Intake Modification
I just found this site that addresses this mod.
http://www.tccoa.com/articles/intake/maf/index.shtml
And I quote:
" Other modifications can affect even a stock sensor. The airbox, inlet tube and intake tube to the throttle body will cause the system as a whole to be slightly different. Let's not get too freaked out though. Again, the benefits of these mods are often marginally good. One key thing to remember is that the closer the MAF is to the throttle body the higher the effect the intake feedback has on the meter's accuracy. The fewer restrictions you have between these parts also can cause problems, usually rough idle and poor performance at low throttle positions. Ideally get the MAF farther away from the throttle body."
http://www.tccoa.com/articles/intake/maf/index.shtml
And I quote:
" Other modifications can affect even a stock sensor. The airbox, inlet tube and intake tube to the throttle body will cause the system as a whole to be slightly different. Let's not get too freaked out though. Again, the benefits of these mods are often marginally good. One key thing to remember is that the closer the MAF is to the throttle body the higher the effect the intake feedback has on the meter's accuracy. The fewer restrictions you have between these parts also can cause problems, usually rough idle and poor performance at low throttle positions. Ideally get the MAF farther away from the throttle body."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chevydream
Chevy Silverado/ GMC Sierra Forum
6
11-02-2005 04:05 AM