Chevy Silverado/ GMC Sierra Forum Discuss the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra here.

negative affect???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 11-07-2007 | 08:14 PM
taro2413's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 17
Default RE: negative affect???

Yea i took the tbs back off and the truck runs like a champ now. What would i use to clean the MAF? I'll do the battery opinion as well...after i do that should i put the tbs back on and upload my stock tune and see what happens?....just an idea i had lol
 
  #22  
Old 11-07-2007 | 08:42 PM
Cracker's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 621
From:
Default RE: negative affect???

Electrical parts cleaner...
Why not, your stock tune won't damage anything.
 
  #23  
Old 11-07-2007 | 09:42 PM
smoke20's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,701
From:
Default RE: negative affect???

You can use carb cleaner on the sensor as well. Then I would put put stock tune back in, and do a test run. Next add TBS, reset computer and do a test run. Depending on those results, then I would try adding the tune back in and doing a test run. Try to get some real numbers to compare like 0-60, 45-65, fuel milage, etc. Whatever you can get to get numbers to compare instead of feel.
 
  #24  
Old 11-08-2007 | 07:33 AM
jcbst12's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,855
From:
Default RE: negative affect???

They make MAF sensor cleaner thats safe for all sensors. When you take the tune off its going to feel like its running lean but I have noticed that I am getting better gas mileage than I was when it was 100% stock.
 
  #25  
Old 11-08-2007 | 07:37 AM
Cracker's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 621
From:
Default RE: negative affect???

Your getting better mileage than stock but not better than with the Hypertech?
 
  #26  
Old 11-08-2007 | 07:54 AM
jcbst12's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,855
From:
Default RE: negative affect???

Technically yes, because I've been running a 87 tune with 87 octane in the tank and she dogs a little. Hypertech said it was because of the CIA, TBS and MAF mod (together, just one or two would be ok). Too much air will lean out the mixture and the programmer can't adjust the settings enough for this and it causes the timing to retard causing a power loss. If you run 89 its fine and gets about the same mileage as I do now without it ( but without it obviously theres less power, but the same mileage). Same with the 91 tune, I need 93 to make it run well. Correction: According to the Hypertech guys theory I would need 93 for 91 tune but I never tried it, just the 87 tune with 89.
 
  #27  
Old 11-08-2007 | 09:33 AM
Cracker's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 621
From:
Default RE: negative affect???

Recap - with my mods.....Hypertech at 87....I should run 89 for optimum effect.......did I get that right?
 
  #28  
Old 11-08-2007 | 11:45 AM
jcbst12's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,855
From:
Default RE: negative affect???

Yes. Try it out. When you run the tank empty, fill it with a quarter to a half tank of 89 and mash the gas a couple of times. If you notice a positive difference than the 87 might not have been enough. My truck would knock once right off of idle (only for a second) when hitting the gas hard and changing to 89 stopped it.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shaggy
Chevy Silverado/ GMC Sierra Forum
3
08-24-2009 08:01 AM
silverado17
Chevy Silverado/ GMC Sierra Forum
0
02-07-2009 11:31 PM
moose
Chevy Silverado/ GMC Sierra Forum
6
03-09-2008 11:49 AM
gotbill
General Motors Tech
1
06-04-2005 01:59 PM



Quick Reply: negative affect???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.