turbo vs supercharged
#6
RE: turbo vs supercharged
They both have there pro's and con's the supercharger gives you power at any RPM, when the turbo gives you power at higher RPM's and takes time to spool up. The turbo is free power but the supercharger is belt driven so it takes HP to make HP
#9
RE: turbo vs supercharged
sounds like most people are leaning towards the turbo on this one...
however for the money that is needed to get these friggen things. i would just go with either a larger crate engine, or some major overhaulin. my buddy just bought a 5000 motor out of the states. it was a 350 with the crazyiest amount of power he has ever seen, including installation! why wouldnt you go for the upgrade that way instead of the turbo or supercharger!
not to mention all the machine work you could do to your truck for 5000- 8000 bucks!
screw the turbo... when you've maxed out your engine... then throw it on!
however for the money that is needed to get these friggen things. i would just go with either a larger crate engine, or some major overhaulin. my buddy just bought a 5000 motor out of the states. it was a 350 with the crazyiest amount of power he has ever seen, including installation! why wouldnt you go for the upgrade that way instead of the turbo or supercharger!
not to mention all the machine work you could do to your truck for 5000- 8000 bucks!
screw the turbo... when you've maxed out your engine... then throw it on!
#10
RE: turbo vs supercharged
Turbos are the only way to go. go get a couple turbo's from a turbo coupe T-bird and make your own kit. I'm playing around with twin turbo's on my mustang. you know now days you can mount the turbos way in therear of the carand there is no need for an intercooler, they say there is no lag either. superchargers are cool but nothing sounds like a turbo.